ByteDance's Seedance 1.5 and Kuaishou's Kling 3.0 are two of the most capable AI video generators. Both produce 1080p video up to 10 seconds. Which one is right for your project?
Side-by-side feature comparison of ByteDance and Kuaishou AI video models
| Feature | Seedance 1.5 | Kling 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | ByteDance | Kuaishou |
| Max Duration | Up to 10s | Up to 10s |
| Resolution | 1080p | 1080p |
| Text to Video | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Image to Video | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Available Versions | 2 | 6 |
| Heritage | TikTok parent company | Short video platform |
| Motion Quality | Good | Excellent |
| Best For | Natural scenes | Action, physics |
The race to build the best AI video generator is fiercely competitive, and two of the strongest contenders come from China's tech powerhouses. ByteDance, the company behind TikTok, developed Seedance. Kuaishou, operator of one of China's largest short-video platforms, created Kling. Both models have evolved rapidly through 2025, and both are now available on Aura AI without regional restrictions or VPN workarounds.
Seedance 1.5 is ByteDance's latest release. It inherits the company's deep understanding of short-form video content and focuses on natural, organic motion. Flowing water, drifting clouds, swaying trees, and subtle facial expressions all look convincing. Seedance tends to favor softer transitions and cinematic compositions, making it a strong pick for lifestyle content, nature footage, and atmospheric storytelling. With two available versions on Aura AI, creators can choose the quality tier that matches their project and budget.
Kling 3.0 comes from Kuaishou's extensive research into video understanding and generation. Where Seedance leans toward natural aesthetics, Kling leans toward dynamic motion and realistic physics. Objects collide, fabrics tear, liquids splash, and characters move with weight and momentum. The model offers six distinct versions on Aura AI, giving users granular control over speed, quality, and cost. For action sequences, product demos with physical interaction, and scenes that demand convincing physics, Kling 3.0 is hard to beat.
On paper the two models look remarkably similar. Both generate up to 10 seconds of 1080p video. Both support text-to-video and image-to-video workflows. Both come from companies with billions of short-video views flowing through their platforms daily. The real differences emerge when you look at the output. Seedance produces smoother, more cinematic results that suit organic scenes. Kling delivers sharper, more physically grounded clips that excel with action and interaction. The good news is that you do not have to choose one permanently. Aura AI hosts both models side by side, so you can generate the same prompt on each and pick the result you prefer.
There is no single winner here. Seedance 1.5 and Kling 3.0 represent two different philosophies applied to the same problem, and both deliver impressive results. If your content features landscapes, portraits, and calm storytelling, start with Seedance. If your content involves fast motion, physical interaction, and dynamic energy, start with Kling. Either way, Aura AI lets you access both through one account with no watermarks and no restrictions.
Common questions about Seedance vs Kling on Aura AI
Access both Chinese AI video powerhouses on Aura AI — no watermarks, no restrictions